America’s 50 percent foreign policy is based on interests, and 50 percent is based on wars. If a country has valuable resources, America’s first preference is to negotiate with the government of that country and extract those resources through diplomatic means. In simple terms, the price-setting authority for these resources rests with the customer, meaning the United States.
If the owner of these resources is willing to cooperate with the government of the country, then that’s fine. Otherwise, they attempt to reach all the way to the country’s leadership to secure their interests. If the resource scheme is successful, the United States gains control over setting the prices of the resources, which it desires to acquire. This often leads to a cycle of exploitation.
If the resource scheme fails, the question arises whether an attack on that country is possible. If an attack is possible, the United States initiates the process of smoothing the ground through the media, making allegations of various kinds, ranging from human rights violations to connections with terrorists and weapons of mass destruction. If the target country does not have significant interests for Russia or China, then support for the attack is sought from the United Nations.
In other cases, their traditional allies are rallied to form a “global brotherhood.” Thus, Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, comprising the Forty-Five Pentalateral countries, become the “global brotherhood.” These countries are essentially members of the Forty-Five but repeatedly stress that they represent the “whole world” in their positions. Media noise also reinforces the idea that this is not just the Forty-Five but the entire world.
The European Union plays a significant role in this entire game. It is the union of countries where America does not have to make much effort to get its way. In the member countries of this union, whoever wins elections tends to be aligned with American interests. They may even take drastic measures to please their masters.
Now, let’s look at what these countries are doing under the American umbrella? Why don’t they assert their independence? Why don’t they become players in their own right? The main reason is that they have benefited from serving the interests of American masters for a long time. When they prepare for the looting of another country’s resources, they include a clause that ensures a share of the loot for themselves. And they have received their share.
Additionally, residing in the American camp has another advantage: when American resources do not interest them, they often find a way to secure a share in the resources of that country. They are crafty and usually target weaker countries or regions. For example, consider France’s looting in Africa. The country was buying uranium from Niger at 8 euros per kilogram, while the global market price was 200 euros per kilogram. When Niger revolted against France’s looting, it turned to America and said, “Abu! Abu! Look, they won’t let me buy uranium.”
And immediately, Victoria Nuland from the United States flew to Niger. There was a lot of shouting, but no deal was reached. Meanwhile, the Nigerian government told the French ambassador to leave the country. In response, the opposition African countries rallied to support France’s agenda of attacking Niger to restore France’s interests. In the resulting commotion, dust was raised, and France had to leave Niger.
The key point here is that different countries need to keep serving the American interests in their leadership positions all the time. If they continue to serve these interests, even if their rule is tyrannical, they can stay in power for centuries. It’s just that they must not forget to keep feeding the American masters regularly. If they start to deviate even slightly, the game of removing them from power begins.
A recent example is Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky is following an anti-Russian agenda. However, he has not yet fully cooperated with the American interests in preparing for the upcoming elections in Ukraine. The opposition in Ukraine has either been jailed or has gone underground. Private media is under government control. Yet, Zelensky is still not ready for the elections because he knows that America is preparing to oust him through the elections. So, if his husband stops him from this action, how long does it take for missiles to come from anywhere? The result will be that Russia will get to enjoy Polish sausages.
Is there anyone who can predict the time it takes for missiles to arrive? Russia might go out to eat in the fields. No one is too far away. It is clear that in this situation, Zelensky’s coffin will be carried by American shoulders. And Uncle Biden might say, “Zelensky! Your blood will bring about a revolution!”
Fundamentally, next year, presidential elections are to be held in Ukraine. Despite this, Zelensky is not willing to hold elections in Ukraine because he has already eliminated the opposition in Ukraine. It’s either in jail or burnt alive. Private media is also under government control. Still, Zelensky is not ready for the elections.
In this matter, Zelensky’s wife, Siani, has turned out to be smart. She says that Zelensky should not participate in the elections. She says this because she knows that America is preparing to oust Zelensky through the elections. So, if her husband stops her from this action, how long does it take for missiles to come from anywhere? Wherever you look, you will get a missile. It is clear that in this situation, Zelensky’s coffin will be carried by American shoulders. And Uncle Biden might say, “Zelensky! Your blood will bring a revolution!”
