Two aspects of Pakistan’s politics are extremely important which we can interpret as real events and statements. Events are ground facts that cannot be denied and statements are those that rarely turn out to be true.
For example, the event or incident is that Imran Khan assumed his position as the Prime Minister in 2018 and after enjoying power for more than 3 years and making important decisions, he lost power as a result of the no-confidence motion.
The most important statement was that Imran Khan will not complete five years, which proved to be true and the history of domestic politics is a witness that no prime minister in Pakistan has been able to complete its five years, then how could Imran Khan set this national record. ?
However, Imran Khan must have taken this national record as the Prime Minister of the country who was deprived of the Prime Ministership through a no-confidence motion in an apparently democratic manner, which even today PTI describes as a foreign conspiracy.
In a Twitter statement yesterday, former Interior Minister Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed said that Nawaz Sharif and Shehbaz Sharif are not on the same page in the matter of appointment in November. No one can bear the burden of PDM. No one is giving charity to the beggars and the conspiratorial government is a guest for a few weeks.
As per the statement of Sheikh Rasheed, the federal government has only a few weeks left while the current government has always denied such claims of PTI and Awami Muslim League, then only this can be said that Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed is a personal analysis.
The fact is that the present government is taking big decisions in the interest of the people and also in its own interest. For example, in the interest of the public, important measures like NAB amendments, trips abroad to collect aid from all over the world for the flood victims, etc.
With the passage of time, the political consciousness of the people has also grown tremendously and the people also do not give more importance to such political statements than statements, but politicians also have to consider the facts before such statements because such claims are rarely true.
